By: Tom Sydney Kerckhove <syd@cs-syd.eu>
#1637, don't demand type applications in infix positions An operator used infix or in a section, and a constructor pattern in record or infix form, cannot carry a visible type application either. Flagging them asked the reader to restructure the expression, which is not what the restriction is for. Parenthesised, as in (<+>), the operator is back in prefix position and is still checked.
Total
2s
Created Started Finished
| Time to Start | Worker time | Duration | Time to finish | Idle | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Config | 0s | 2s | 2s | 2s | 0s |
| Eval | - | - | - | - | - |
| Build | - | - | - | - | - |
| Suite | 0s | 2s | 2s | 2s | 0s |