Author: Tom Sydney Kerckhove <syd@cs-syd.eu>
Committer: Tom Sydney Kerckhove <NorfairKing@users.noreply.github.com>
Track erratum 1913 Erratum 1913 corrects the sentence that says a numeric BYDAY with FREQ=YEARLY is an offset within the year "when the BYWEEKNO or BYMONTH rule parts are present", which contradicts the clause before it, to say "are not present". The behaviour it asks for is already there, because verified erratum 3779 corrects the same sentence to the same effect and is already on the list. This is a gap in the checklist rather than in the code. Found while checking whether discarding the numeric part of a BYDAY when BYWEEKNO is given was right: under both the published sentence and either correction, the number cannot mean anything once BYWEEKNO has fixed the week.